Film Scouts Reviews


by Karen Jaehne

Buy this video from

Music from
Buy The Soundtrack.

Oliver Stone's bombastic directorial style is always fun to watch-yet never credible. Thus he has found the perfect subject: the liar of all American liars. As usual, Stone has managed to generate controversy, ranging from old Watergate impressarios whining on the op-ed pages to historians warning him that his kind of history will be the downfall of the empire! Yawn......

Despite the pundits, "Nixon" is an obvious challenge, not least for British actor Anthony Hopkins, arguably the greatest actor of our time playing the worst actor ever to stride the stage of politics. Hopkins acquits himself by making the chip on Nixon's shoulder bigger than the hunch-back himself.

Hopkins' performance is fall that saves the movie from the excesses of Oliver, who frolics in the cheezy and cheap techniques of cheap advertising-clouds racing across the sky above the capitol, b & w flashbacks to the California of Grapes and Wrath, etc. Stone has made so much money, he's surely deep into analysis by now, which may account for the way he allows himself to get distracted by Freud. He has projected onto the story of the indefatigable Nixon the tale of a Quaker mother who wants Richard always to tell the truth. Incidentally, she is completely inept at using "thee" and "thou" properly. (Haven't the screenwriters ever dipped into the King James Version?)

Stone's best scenes are when Nixon boils over about the effete (expletive) intellectual (expletive) snobs of the East (expletive) Coast (expletive) Establishment. Nixon's arrogance in being a self-made man seems to be the only thing he ever had to be proud of; all that other territory, like foreign policy, has been claimed by Kissinger! But the man he created out of himself was a fabric of lies. That's the myth of Nixon Agonistes.

The only interesting question the film raises is not really inside the film. It's in the response to the film. Nobody asks the question, WHY NOT LIE? In post-Nixon America, it's the rule, not the exception. It's also, paradoxically, our favorite way of discrediting the other guy: S/HE'S LYING!

Does anybody care? No, because we assume we are being lied to, and the news and subsequent record called History only prove to us that we are justified in that belief. In politics, lying is de rigeur (that's French for "shut up and die like an aviator"). Government officials lie, because the press can't report accurately and is prone to think "we have a right to know" justifies screwing up long-range planning. Politicians lie, because they don't trust the voters to understand the tangled skein of issues that affect, say, the First Amendment and the internet. And they're right! Who would trust megaliths like Time/Warner or The New York Times (who clearly have their own agendas)? Who would trust the people who voted for Reagan twice?

Politicians lie the same way baseball players chew tobacco or bond salesmen jump up on their seats after making a million bucks. And Nixon's the guy who made that all perfectly clear.

The comedic part of Stone's film is when the Watergaters stand around wringing their hands over who may know they're lying. Puhleeze. Everybody knew it. It's been our political stock in trade since at least four-score and seven years ago.

I can't wait for Oliver Stone's next prexy bio-pic. Will he continue his obsession with the Deceit of America by taking on Reagan, The Great Communicator?

Back to Nixon

Back to the Press Room

Look for Search Tips

Copyright 1994-2008 Film Scouts LLC
Created, produced, and published by Film Scouts LLC
Film Scouts® is a registered trademark of Film Scouts LLC
All rights reserved.

Suggestions? Comments? Fill out our Feedback Form.